On July 20, 2012 a man with a serious mental illness entered a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. He set off tear gas grenades and then shot into the audience with multiple firearms. He killed 12 people and injured 70 others. At the time of this incident it was the largest number of casualties in a shooting in the United States.
_____________________________________________________________
Two nights later my son, Patrick, showed me an editorial
cartoon he was reading online. The cartoon pictured a man with a disability standing
on the sidewalk gazing up at a very long stairway that led up to a psychiatrist
sitting in the clouds. On the sidewalk right next to the man was a gun store
with an open door and a sign saying, “Come Right In.”
Patrick and I discussed the obvious irony in the cartoon for
a few minutes. Neither of us could find words to express our sadness about the
Aurora incident. Like most people across the country we had watched and listened to many
stories on television about the victims of the shooting. As we talked about the
cartoon I felt my eyes tearing up.
At that moment I felt an impulse to do something. I felt
compelled to respond to the horrible incident in Aurora in some small way. So I
went upstairs to my computer and sent the following email to an
acquaintance of mine who worked as a fundraiser for the NRA.
Hello Ben. I have wondered lately
if the NRA supports (or would be interested in supporting) improved access to
mental health programs for high risk individuals. I think this represents a
win/win opportunity for otherwise opposing interests. What do you think?
I did not expect a response to this email. But the act of
writing and sending it helped me feel a little better. Taking a useless action
felt slightly better than taking no action at all. At that moment I had no
idea why or how the NRA could support improved access to mental health services. I just had a feeling that something as counter-intuitive as this might be a good idea.
idea why or how the NRA could support improved access to mental health services. I just had a feeling that something as counter-intuitive as this might be a good idea.
I forgot about the email so I was surprised to receive a
response from Ben about a week later. He emailed me and asked me to give him a
call. We chatted for a few minutes about a mental health project that the two
of us had worked on prior to his accepting a position as Vice President of
Development for the NRA. Our former project involved teaching basic business
planning and fundraising skills to people with disabilities who wanted to start
their own “micro-enterprises.” Ben and I worked on this project intermittently
for three years and helped several “teams” of people with mental illness launch
their own very small businesses. Our phone conversation eventually got around to
the subject of my email.
Ben said that it was possible, although not likely, that the NRA would support the idea of improved access to mental health treatment for people who might be at risk of violent behavior. I found his opinion encouraging so I kept my mouth shut and just listened. Ben explained that for years the NRA had supported the idea of restricting gun sales to people with mental illness. As an example, he described an appearance of Wayne LaPierre, the CEO of the NRA, on a TV talk show years several years ago. During the talk show Wayne (as Ben referred to him) expressed his support for restricting gun rights to people with mental illness. According to Ben, Wayne got really angry and said something like, “but the damned ACLU won’t allow it to happen.”
I eventually searched around on the internet and figured out that the
“it” that the American Civil Liberties Union would not allow was the NRA’s idea
to limit gun sales to people with mental illness by creating “an electronic
universal mental health registry of people adjudicated to be incompetent.” I
saw some obvious legal and ethical problems with that idea but it seemed like a
good place to start a search for common ground between the NRA and advocates
for improved mental health services.
Ben told me that he had a very good relationship with Woody
Phillips, Chief Financial Officer, of the NRA. Woody also managed the NRA Foundation.
Woody’s office was right next door to Wayne LaPierre’s. Ben said he thought
Woody Phillips would be the most receptive person within the inner circle of executive
leadership of the NRA. Ben said that he would present the idea to Woody. This
was beginning to sound very interesting.
On August 1, 2012 Ben sent me the following
email message and copied Woody Phillips.
Michael - Thanks for your note of July
23 asking about NRA's possible interest in improving access to mental health
programs for high-risk individuals. I spoke today with Woody Phillips, the CFO
for NRA. NRA has a strong interest in mental health issues as they relate to
the protection of the Second Amendment. Woody would be happy to speak with you
about NRA's interest and hear your thoughts.
Woody invited you to join us in a phone
meeting to discuss these matters. My assistant will be in contact with everyone
to set up a time and the details of the call. I will also have her set up a
time for you and me to talk before the phone call with Woody.
Please let me know any thoughts or
questions in the meantime. I look forward to talking again soon. thx ben
Ben
This was now sounding incredible. I was
about to have a conversation with the CFO of the NRA about the organization’s
possible support for improving mental health services. After a series of emails
with Woody’s secretary a conference call was set for August 16, 2012. Ben and I
agreed to have a conversation prior to our phone call with Woody to get clear
on the “what” and “why” of our message.
In the days prior to the conference
call I had some moments of doubt. This certainly seemed like an interesting
opportunity but an opportunity for what? What was I really talking about? What
did I want to see happen?
I decided that a realistic expectation for
my conversation with Woody Phillips would be to get an agreement from the NRA
to meet privately with representatives of national mental health advocacy
groups. I thought if human beings from these divergent groups could meet
together in the aftermath of Aurora they might spontaneously find some areas of
agreement. I fantasized being the facilitator of the meeting and moderating the
discussion.
Suddenly a different problem occurred
to me. What if the mental health advocacy community was unwilling to
participate in a discussion with the NRA? So I called Linda Rosenberg.
Linda Rosenberg is the President and
CEO of the National Council for Behavioral Health. The National Council
describes itself as “the unifying voice of America’s mental health and
addiction treatment programs.” The organization has 2500 member agencies across
the country. Among many other activities, the National Council hosts a program
called Mental Health First Aid which trains teachers, church leaders, court
counselors, and others who are not mental health professionals to recognize the
signs and symptoms of mental illness and to make appropriate referrals for
treatment. I had recently introduced Linda as a keynote speaker at a conference
in North Carolina and I hoped she might remember my name.
I am not sure Linda remembered my name
but she took my call. I said something like, “Linda, I have a very unusual
idea.” I went on to make the following points:
- I had two contacts within the NRA.
- The NRA might be motivated to do something positive related to improved access to mental health services.
- The NRA and the National Council are both headquartered in Washington, DC and both are very effective at lobbying Congress. Imagine the possibilities if the two organizations could find even one policy position that they agreed on.
There was a long pause. I don’t
remember exactly what Linda said but she did not sound convinced so I made
another point.
- One of my contacts at the NRA is a fundraiser and the other is the administrator of the NRA Foundation. The National Council might be able to persuade the NRA Foundation to fund an expansion of the Mental Health First Aid program.
I do remember what Linda said then.
“Michael, we will talk to anybody.”
So, game on.
On August 16, 2012 Ben and I had a
preliminary phone conversation in which he gave me some background on Woody
Phillips. Ben cautioned me to keep the conversation on “the right issue” which
was mental illness, not guns. I told Ben that I did not have a gun and never
experienced the need for one. I did not know anything about guns but could
contribute some ideas about mental health issues.
The conference call with Woody was
extremely friendly and interesting. I learned that Woody was from Henderson,
NC, a town with which I was very familiar. Woody graduated from Wake Forest
University. He was fluent in the language of college sports. He sounded like a
pretty regular guy.
Once we got on topic of the call I talked a little about some of the barriers to treatment that many people with mental illness experience. Woody and I discussed the cultural stigma associated with mental illness and addictions. We talked about the lack of services in so many rural communities like the one he grew up in. I spoke briefly about how Mental Health First Aid was helping people in rural and urban communities across the country.
Eventually, Woody reminded me that the
business of the NRA was protecting and promoting the Second Amendment and that
mental health was not part of their mission. He asked me to explain my
proposal. I told him that I was merely suggesting
a private conversation among leaders of the NRA and the National Council of
Behavioral Health. I told him that I did not know what specific outcomes would
flow from the conversation. I pointed out that both organizations were highly
effective in shaping public policy. If they could find a shared goal or a
common policy position they might surprise people in both camps. Woody sounded
interested.
He stated that “nothing is going to
happen until after the election in November.” He said he would ask his secretary
to remind him to revisit this topic after November 6, 2012 and to schedule
another meeting with Ben and me.
Shortly after we ended the conference call
I got the following email message from Ben.
8/16/2012 Appreciate your being on the phone with
Woody. It was a very positive conversation. I will keep encouraging
Woody to look for a date for a next meeting after the election. It would
be great to consider other potential mental health partners that could work
together to accomplish the shared goals we discussed. Will be in contact
as we look to next meeting after 11/6. Thx ben
I was encouraged, even excited. There
was something exhilarating about this. Perhaps, it was exhilarating because it
was an attempt to do the impossible.
The Presidential election came and
went. I waited impatiently for a few days and then started sending short,
friendly email reminders to Ben. I was probably annoying. Eventually, Ben
responded.
Hi
Michael. Thanks for this note. I have a reminder set on this for Monday,
November 19. I will reach out to Woody at that time to try to get something
moving forward on this. Thx ben.
I waited. Then all hell broke loose.
On December 14, 2012 a young man with a
serious mental illness shot and killed 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook
Elementary School in Connecticut.
The entire country seemed to be in a state of shock. That afternoon I sent an email to Ben that ended with:
The
news out of Connecticut is heartbreaking for everyone. I am sensitive to how
busy you are and I do not want to push too hard on this. However, I cannot give
up.
Ben sent the following response:
You were the first person I thought of when I heard this news.I will contact Woody again on Monday. Thx ben
Things at the NRA seemed to be moving very quickly. I sent Ben another email with a list of suggestions that I thought they might consider regarding "the mental health issue." I thanked Ben for his courage in sticking with this. He responded with:
I will. Today is probably one of the craziest days in history there. Let me think about timing. I know it has to be right away. Thx. Ben
On December 19, 2012 Ben copied me on the following email to Woody Phillips in which he summarized my suggestions.
You were the first person I thought of when I heard this news.I will contact Woody again on Monday. Thx ben
Things at the NRA seemed to be moving very quickly. I sent Ben another email with a list of suggestions that I thought they might consider regarding "the mental health issue." I thanked Ben for his courage in sticking with this. He responded with:
I will. Today is probably one of the craziest days in history there. Let me think about timing. I know it has to be right away. Thx. Ben
On December 19, 2012 Ben copied me on the following email to Woody Phillips in which he summarized my suggestions.
Woody: Michael
sent the following notes to me. I am sure there are plenty of discussions about
NRA's response to this tragedy. Wayne, you and the gang know how to manage this
far better than Michael or me. I believe Michael's thoughts were worthwhile as
a possible forward stance that NRA could take. So for what they are worth...
1. More effective restrictions on gun procession for people known to be experiencing symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia
1. More effective restrictions on gun procession for people known to be experiencing symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia
2. Protecting the Second
Amendment rights of people with mental illness or histories of mental illness
who are not a threat
3. Supporting an unprecedented
national public health campaign to educate citizens about serious mental
illnesses and appropriate individual and community responses
4. Promoting re-examination of
state's involuntary commitment laws for people with serious mental illness
The question I keep hearing asked is - what if anything would have prevented this guy from doing what he did? None of the suggestions I have heard in the media would work or have done so. However, numbers 3 and 4 would certainly be steps forward that NRA could suggest and support. I liked them because they put the focus on mental illness and not guns.
All my best to you. Thx ben
The question I keep hearing asked is - what if anything would have prevented this guy from doing what he did? None of the suggestions I have heard in the media would work or have done so. However, numbers 3 and 4 would certainly be steps forward that NRA could suggest and support. I liked them because they put the focus on mental illness and not guns.
All my best to you. Thx ben
Shortly after that email was sent Ben and I talked briefly
on the phone. Ben had learned that someone else at the NRA was assigned to follow up on their response to the “mental health” issue. Ben said that the
NRA was now considering the formation of their own Mental Health Commission to
study the issues and make recommendations. He thought this might be announced soon
at a press conference. Ben said he had recommended that I be included on this
Commission.
On December 21 Ben copied me on the following email
that he sent to the NRA staff person who was organizing the Commission.
Hi Millie. Know it is crazy so I
will be very brief. You should have an email forwarded to you from Woody about
Michael Owen, including his resume. Michael is someone that should be
included on the NRA’s mental health commission.
He brings great insights into the
mental health community including how it really works (or doesn’t). He is
a grassroots, community mental health person of very high intellect who is not
afraid to challenge the status quo. In fact, my work with him was part of a
state-wide effort in North Carolina to change the whole delivery system for
mental health services in NC and Michael was the straw stirring the
drink. He also can help Wayne and the NRA understand the mental health
community and how to communicate with it and about it. Please note
this. His original approach to me about organizing mental health
leaders to work with the NRA to address the mental health/Second Amendment
issues was more than six months ago, which I discussed with Woody this past
summer. Michael, as he communicated in his note to Woody, is very
committed to helping to solve the correct issue. If you need any further
information on Michael, please contact me.
You are in my prayers at this time of great stress to our Second Amendment right. Regards to Ralph. Thx ben
You are in my prayers at this time of great stress to our Second Amendment right. Regards to Ralph. Thx ben
Later that day Ben sent me a one-sentence email. He said, “I think we
have been blown off.”
I did not immediately understand the significance of that
sentence. However, it became clear when the NRA held a press conference that same day - Dec.
21, 2012. I was hoping they were going to announce the formation of their
Mental Health Commission. Instead, Wayne LaPierre announced the formation of National
School Safety Shield Program. This NRA-funded initiative was being created to
put an armed security guard in every school in the United States. They had
decided to go in a different direction.
Starting in January 2013 I have sent an email every few
months to my contacts at the NRA. The most recent one was last week. The messages are always short, polite
reminders about the potential value of building a relationship within the
mental health advocacy community. Back on October 24, 2013 I got a reply that
offered enough encouragement to keep trying. It said:
No comments:
Post a Comment